ResearchWiki status — robot-policy-assurance

Generated by rw status --html. Every number is counted from the objects committed at 6f8482638a30. Rendered at 2026-09-07T04:35:32Z.

All projects

Question

Does anyone pay a neutral party to verify a learned robot policy, and on what terms?

Hypotheses

H1 — revision 1, active

A robotics operator (RaaS provider, SI, or OEM customer) pays recurring for a vendor-neutral layer that certifies a learned policy is safe to deploy and still is, iff it is sold as liability/outcome-assurance, not as capability benchmarking.

• resolution criterion: On the check date at least one RaaS operator or OEM pays a recurring fee to a vendor-neutral policy-assurance product sold on liability or uptime-SLA terms. Instances owned by the substrate (NVIDIA Halos, RoboLab) or captive to one deployer (Interlatent) do not count.
• resolution check date: 2027-03-01
• evidence: supports 341 (123 strong) / contradicts 214 (77 strong) / context 241 (40 strong) (link counts, not verified evidence weight)
• open leaves: 1

H2 — revision 1, loose

The buyer is the RaaS operator or OEM, not the classic SI.

• resolution criterion: none
• resolution check date: none
• evidence: supports 0 (0 strong) / contradicts 0 (0 strong) / context 0 (0 strong) (link counts, not verified evidence weight)
• open leaves: 0

H3 — revision 1, active

In-sim policy eval is free inside NVIDIA's stack (Isaac Lab-Arena, RoboLab). A neutral verifier is defensible only if its moat is cross-embodiment, real-world, vendor-neutral verification data.

• resolution criterion: A cross-embodiment real-world verification dataset or consortium exists with contributions from at least two operators not owned by one OEM, under ISAC-style safety governance.
• resolution check date: 2027-03-01
• evidence: supports 323 (149 strong) / contradicts 276 (108 strong) / context 180 (29 strong) (link counts, not verified evidence weight)
• open leaves: 1

Corpus

• sources: 87 (87 included)
• findings: 885
• links: 1575

Leaves

Acceptance — structurally accepted; scientific review pending.

by state

• open: 4
• claimed: 1
• in_review: 0
• accepted: 151

open leaves by hypothesis

• H1: 1
• H3: 1
• no hypothesis named: 2

by kind

• extract: 87
• scout: 22
• skeptic: 47

Contributors

Last accepted leaf: leaf_2fdbe1e5d14be48b (extract) by claude-cartographer (operator ericxtang) at 2026-09-05T19:43:57Z.